Book Review – Dancing at Armageddon: Survivalism and Chaos in Modern Times

The short version: A sociologist/scholar spends years hanging out with various survivalists, then offers up theories about survivalism. Well-written but loses focus. Skip the edubabble. There is no appreciable hands-on survivalism knowledge in this book.

Dancing at Armageddon was written by one Richard G. Mitchell Jr., who explains he needed a “fresh” unexplored sociological subject to write about and found one in survivalists…problem is, he doesn’t do them any favors. Mitchell starts with the claim that James Huberty was the media’s stereotype of a survivalist (my own stereotype would be Burt Gummer from the Tremors movies) and goes from there.

Dancing was printed in 2002 but unfortunately is already dated, covering only the 1980s to early 90s, before widespread internet access, Y2K and, of course, 9-11. Even these “paradigm shifts” probably wouldn’t add up to much in uniting fringe groups or makeshift militias.

Mitchell “trains” with survivalists, who run the gamut from poor loners to wealthy suburbanites. He tosses off a lot of theories about the type of person that gravitates towards survivalism, their thought processes, etc,. using a lot of edubabble that only professors and other obfuscators would find interesting or helpful.

If you only read the first half of the book, you’d think survivalists were for the most part harmless scrabblers, tinkerers, information traders and universal hoplophiles*, engaged in a kind of hobby. The tone changes in the second half of the book, after Mitchell attends retreats and “churches” of White racial purists. What he sees (and caricatures) causes him to lose all objectivity, which is understandable for a human but unacceptable for a researching writer.

The so-called “White Power” movement (which does more harm than good to Euro-American culture and traditions) is peopled with misfits and losers; the same would go for any “race pride” group.

While I admire Mitchell for walking the talk in befriending many survivalists (and exposing the media’s sensational thirst to create enemy Outsiders) in the end he remains a (naturally) liberal perfesser. Having grown crankier and more cynical during years of study, for the last third of the book his original mission of exploring survivalism all but vanishes. You can take or leave his theories, but either way this isn’t an overall satisfying read.

* lovers of firearms

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Book Review – Dancing at Armageddon: Survivalism and Chaos in Modern Times”

  1. Digital Howie Says:

    Fuck surviving. Why does anyone want to survive? Survive so you can remain alive in this world of utter and senseless nonsense? So you can keep working a shit job for shit pay in order to have a roof over your head and food in your gut? That’s survival? Yes, in it’s purest form but so what. I’ve had a good, long taste of “surviving” in this world of shit and why anyone would do something to survive further is obviously out of their minds.

  2. meatlights39 Says:

    I’ve already said it: “Whoever heard of a suicidal survivalist?” Perhaps going through the motions of surviving makes you want to live, or at least ignore suicide. The new Batman movie is coming in June or July…

  3. Digital Howie Says:

    I think survivalism applies mostly to the camping crowd. Camping was fun occassionally, but EVERY DAY – it would suck! – Motel Todd

  4. meatlights39 Says:

    Complain how you will, a total breakdown of our society will bring a lot more than mere discomfort. Sealing the border would help.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: