A child raped by two Kennedys

On the (Supreme Court’s) bad decision to rule out death for child rapists–

This one really troubles me because the real justice is generally accomplished by other prisoners killing or attempting to kill child molesters and rapists as they are considered the lowest form of life by the criminal fraternity. So how come the supremes don’t see this? If criminals who have the least respect for law can see the merits in killing them, how come the dudes and dudettes of supreme justice cannot see this? I do wonder…

–Internet opinion

What I wonder is why an enraged mob hasn’t yet burned the Supreme Court to the ground. These supremely arrogant jerkoffs have gotten it wrong over and over again, and this latest awful decision speaks volumes for the decline of Western Civilization.

The senile Supremes claim that “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” are what prohibits the death penalty for child rapists. Bullshit. If your baby daughter was brutally raped, would you deal with her rapist less severely then if he’d murdered her?

Even if the one Kennedy said the other Kennedy’s unspeakable crime did deserve the death penalty, the convicted would still earn a gentle death compared to the harm he’s caused. Now we won’t get even that.

And so goes the tale of a child raped by two Kennedys, first Patrick the Monster, then Anthony the Arrogant, who thinks his black robe is a crown, for failing to deliver justice.

Mercy for the guilty is cruelty to the innocent.

As for convicted child rapist Patrick O. Kennedy, Louisiana should kill him anyway. Putting him in the prison yard for about 5 minutes would do it.